Showing posts with label Wagoner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wagoner. Show all posts

Monday, December 3, 2012

Five reasons why rick wagoner should (not?) be fired

GM should file for bankruptcy -(JACK WELCH) RUBBISH! we’re still the us sales leader (RICK WAGONER)

Legacy (Oxford): Anything passed down from the past, as from an ancestor or a predecessor Let’s talk about the founding ancestors of the modern General Motors, or rather the two predecessors – Alfred Sloan and William Durant. They were not only the longest serving Chairpersons of GM, but were also the most successful ever! And what ‘legacy’ did they pass down? Well, their pioneering strategies saw GM take on the might of even Ford Motors, the champion who gave the world the popular Model-T. Yes, GM had become the largest car manufacturer in the world, mighty and strong... big and famous! But ‘big’ necessarily needn’t prove ‘beautiful’! At the turn of the 20th century, GM’s ‘market segregation’ strategy turned its fortunes for the better. As the then Chairman Sloan put it famously – “A car for every purse!” GM put it in practice by attending to segments, which differed from each other in preferences and propensities to consume (income). It was a time when the company had some of the best-known American automotive brands in its kitty, some like Chevrolet, Buick, Oldsmobile & Cadillac; yes, different cars for different groups. Differential pricing strategies were adopted, and GM started adhering to strictly defined consumer choices. And this ‘legacy’ was proudly passed on, and more successfully used, but only until recently! Here, you might just ask: “But what’s wrong with segmentation and pricing differentials?” The answer’s simple silly – selling the wrong product at the wrong price to the wrong segment at the wrong time; Rick mastered it all with the present day SUV!

Legacy: Pertaining to something old/outdated, does not work well with present up-to-date systems “We have proliferated our brands and dealer network to the point where we lost adequate focus on our core US market. We also biased our product mix toward pick-up trucks and SUVs. And, we made commitments to compensation plans that have proven to be unsustainable in ‘today’s’ globally competitive industry!” 

Read more......

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Friday, October 19, 2012

GENERAL MOTOR CO.: FAILURE

...and the shareholders get their pants walloped! 

Swing & Miss #3: GM’s premature focus on hybrids cost the company too much. Despite being in the news for over 15 years now, hybrids only contribute to about 2.15% of all vehicle sales! Then there are reports which prove how by 2020, oil production will cross a smashing 1,600 million barrels annually – 6667% more than what was produced in 2003! In other words, hybrids are not required in the near future year, but Wagoner still believes it, for he has to swing!

Swing & Miss #4: Wagoner’s confused branding strategies have ensured that high-end sports cars (like the Corvette Z01) & small cars (like the Spark) are sold under the same tag, Chevrolet? Apparently, he skipped branding management lectures too! Swing & Miss #5: During his tenure, this “easy-going” CEO destroyed a blood-freezing 98% of GM’s Mcap, shaving-off of a clean $90 billion of shareholder wealth. And just before he was booted-out by the Obama administration last month, he had the most wonderful gift for all at GM – a record $52.8 billion in losses for FY2008!

Well, today, Wagoner’s out, but GM has to live on. But will it? “A lot of things depend on the survival plan that GM will present but filing for bankruptcy makes sense as of now,” claims Christian Breitsprecher, Industry expert, Sal Oppenheim. Well, June 1 is not far away. Fingers crossed...


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face